Business ProfileforJersey Pride Home Renovations
Current Alerts For This Business
Additional business information
The following describes a pending government action that has been formally brought by a government agency but has not yet been resolved. We are providing a summary of the governments allegations, which have not yet been proven.
December 27, 2017 NEWARK – Attorney General Christopher S. Porrino and the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs have filed a Complaint alleging that a South Jersey-based contractor used deceptive practices to obtain more than $348,000 in federal relief funds from nine homeowners who sought to have their damaged homes rebuilt, elevated and/or repaired after Superstorm Sandy.
According to the Complaint, filed in the Superior Court Chancery Division in Ocean County, D.J.M. Households Inc., doing business as Jersey Pride Home Renovations, and its owner, William A. Wolford, allegedly violated the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and a number of regulations governing contractors and advertising by failing to perform contracted-for home improvements and/or home elevations after receiving federal Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, Elevation and Mitigation (RREM) Program funds, Landlord Rental Repair Program (LRRP) funds, and consumer payments.
The Complaint alleges that D.J.M. Households, which maintained an office in Cherry Hill and later in Mullica Hill, pressured consumers to sign contracts for renovation, rebuilding and/or elevating Sandy-damaged homes, took money, which included RREM Program or LRRP funds, and then failed to begin work and/or abandoned unfinished projects without returning for weeks, months or at all.
Seven of the consumers identified in the Complaint received funds from the RREM Program, administered by the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (DCA), to pay for construction work on Sandy-damaged homes. Another two consumers identified in the Complaint received LLRP funds, also administered by DCA.
The defendants, the Complaint alleges, sought to pressure consumers into signing contracts by including “terms and conditions” that indicated the quoted price for the home improvement work was only valid for 48 hours and that contractor scheduling was on a “first come first serve method.”
The Complaint also alleges that although the D.J.M. Household contracts often stated that the defendants would obtain the necessary building and zoning permits for the home elevation and home improvement work, the defendants delayed filing for the permits without providing any explanation. These delays caused homeowners to be displaced for even longer periods and resulted in additional housing and/or storage fees. Landlords also were unable to have their rental properties occupied, leading to loss of rental income.
The Complaint, among other things, also alleges that:
- The defendants violated the Home Elevation Regulations by engaging in the business of home elevations without being registered as a Home Elevation Contractor with the Division.
- At various times, the defendants performed home elevation and/or home improvement work in a substandard manner.
- The defendants on at least one occasion abandoned home elevation work while the home was raised, causing the dwelling to separate in the middle and the walls to crack, leaving the home uninhabitable.
- At various times, the defendants performed home improvement and/or home elevation work that failed to pass municipal inspections, and then failed to correct the work.
- The defendants on at least one occasion left construction debris from another home elevation project on a consumer’s property and failed to remove it, causing the consumer to incur additional costs to remove the material.
- At various times, the defendants caused damage to consumers’ homes while performing work and failed to correct the damage or compensate the consumer for the damage.
The Complaint seeks consumer restitution, a return of the federal funds unlawfully acquired by the defendants, civil penalties as well as reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and costs. The Complaint also seeks to permanently enjoin the defendants from performing home elevation and/or home improvement work in New Jersey.
At-a-glance
Related Categories
Business Details
- Location of This Business
- 308 Rabbit Court, Mullica Hill, NJ 08062
- BBB File Opened:
- 10/3/2013
- Years in Business:
- 35
- Business Started:
- 12/27/1988
- Licensing Information:
- This business is in an industry that may require professional licensing, bonding or registration. BBB encourages you to check with the appropriate agency to be certain any requirements are currently being met.BBB records show a license number of 13HE00000800 for this business, issued by NJ Office of Consumer Protection - Regulated Business Section
These agencies may include:
NJ Office of Consumer Protection - Regulated Business Section
PO Box 45028
Newark NJ 07101
- Type of Entity:
- Corporation
- Alternate Business Name
- D.J.M. Households Inc
Customer Complaints
0 Customer Complaints
Need to file a complaint? BBB is here to help. We'll guide you through the process. How BBB Processes Complaints and Reviews
File a ComplaintBBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation.