Business ProfileforNational Administrative Service Co., LLC

According information in BBB files Haytham Elzayn, the owner of National Administrative Service Co., LLC is also the owner of Dimension Service Corporation and Heritage Administration Services affiliated with Allegiance.

The BBB maintains separate reports on each of these companies:

http://www.bbb.org/centralohio/business-reviews/auto-warranty-processing-service/heritage-administration-services-inc-in-dublin-oh-70042117

http://www.bbb.org/centralohio/business-reviews/auto-warranty-processing-service/allegiance-administrators-llc-in-dublin-oh-20000691

On Dec. 4, 2008, Peter Knolla provided BBB the following information regarding what he described as Allegiance Holdings LLC's affiliated companies: Heritage Administration Services, Inc. (HAS) is a service contract administrator that is currently responsible for the majority of complaints being fielded by (BBB) offices due to financial difficulties created by its former owners. HAS is also the majority owner of a risk retention group named Heritage Warranty Insurance RRG, Inc. (HRRG) that provides insurance for HAS's service contract obligations. The HAS and HRRG operations were formerly located in Lincoln, Nebraska and when they were relocated to Ohio different Allegiance company staffs were assigned to conduct their service contract administration duties identified below. Dimension Service Corporation (DSC) is a service contract administrator but performs no service contract administration for HAS or HRRG and is a separate and distinct corporation from those entities. DSC has various insurers other than HRRG providing insurance for its service contract programs. National Administrative Services Corp (NASC) is a service contract administrator and although it's a separate and distinct corporation from HAS and HRRG, NASC does contractually perform some service contract administration for HAS and HRRG along with several other Allegiance entities. And Mr. Knolla provided the further descriptions of the terms obligor names, program names, and insurer's names: OBLIGOR'S NAMES: A service contract is a set of promises (subject to a service contract's terms and conditions) between a consumer and a contract obligor; the party required to perform the service contract's promises. In most instances, the service contract's obligor are one of the below listed service contract administrators. PROGRAM NAMES: Service contracts are sold to consumers through various means such as car dealers, mail solicitations and over the inter net. Different service contract programs are created to meet consumer preferences. As a result, a consumer might only mention the name of the program in their inquiry without identifying the correct obligor. INSURER'S NAMES: Most state laws require the promises made by an obligor of a service contract to be insured and the insurer's identity must be disclosed in the service contract. As a result, a consumer might incorrectly only identify the name of the insurer in their inquiry without disclosing the obligor's correct name."

STATE OF OHIO EX REL ATTY GENERAL DAVE Y -VS- PELICAN INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC ET AL

On Jan. 4, 2023, the Ohio Attorney General’s Office filed a civil lawsuit in Franklin County Common Pleas Court in Columbus, Ohio, against defendants Dimension Service Corporation, Haytham Elzayn, Autoguard Advantage Corporation, National Administrative Service Co, LLC, Pelican Investment Holdings, LLC, Falcon Endeavors, MB Holdings Group, Gustav C. Renny, Vajira Samararatne, Stacey E. Him, Ronald D. Eddington Jr., and Joseph E. Hill Jr. The lawsuit alleges the defendants are in violation of the Telephone Solicitation Sales Act and the Consumer Sales Practices Act.

 

According to the Attorney General's news release, the complaint alleges that: 

 

     1) Delaware-based Pelican Investment Holdings was paying for leads to initiate outbound prerecorded calls to consumers to market and sell  “vehicle service contracts.” The contracts were then “administered” by Dimension Service, Autoguard Advantage and National Administrative Service, all based in Dublin, Ohio. 

 

     2) The prerecorded messages misrepresented the essence of the call, which violates Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act. The calls failed to properly identify the calling party and falsely claimed that the call was about extending the consumer’s auto warranty and was affiliated with the auto manufacturer.

 

     3) For the phone calls that resulted in a contract sale, the defendants did not secure a signed written confirmation of a verbal agreement – a violation of Ohio’s Telephone Solicitation Sales Act. They also violated this law by acting as telephone solicitors without having registered as such with the Ohio Attorney General’s Office and without having obtained and filed the required surety bond.  

https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/Media/News-Releases/January-2023/AG-Yost-Slams-the-Door-Shut-on-%E2%80%98Car-Warranty%E2%80%99-Robo

 

 

The state is asking that the court impose a civil penalty of $1,000-$25,000 for each separation violation of the Telephone Solicitation Sales Act, a civil penalty of up $25,000 for each violation of the Consumer Sales Practices Act, and issue an order prohibiting defendants from engaging in transactions as a supplier or telephone solicitor in Ohio until all monetary amounts ordered paid are satisfied.

 

The matter is pending before the court as of Jan. 5, 2023.

 

For more details you may wish to contact:

 

- The Ohio Attorney General's Office Help Center

Toll-free: 800-282-0515 or Local: 614-466-4986, 30 E. Broad St., 14th Floor, Columbus, OH 43215, http://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/

 

- The Franklin County Clerk of Courts office, concerning case # 23 CV 000047

373 South High Street, Columbus, OH 43215, phone 614-525-3600, http://www.franklincountyohio.gov/clerk/cio.cfm or online http://fcdcfcjs.co.franklin.oh.us/CaseInformationOnline/"